Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Health Care-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Cognitive behavioural therapy in health care. Answer: Introduction: The aftermath of an accident is often much harder to deal with that the actual incident. There are many repercussions that haunt the victims even after years of the accidents they have encountered. The trauma of an accidents is a major cause of mental health adversities in many of the accident victims and there are instances where the victims have to seek out professional mental health care for the post traumatic stress disorders, furthermore, the burden of the accident is even higher for the unfortunate victims that have had to go through a disability due to the accident, it has to be understood that any accident acquired disability is associated with not just physical repercussions but there are many psychological restrictions that facilitate extreme burden on the psychological health and well being of the victims (O'Donnell et al. 2013). This assignment will make use of the theories and principles of the cognitive behavioural therapy are order to design supportive care taking the assistance of a case study. Brief description of the case study: The case study represents the case similar of the patient who had to go through a severe spinal injury due to an accident. Andrew, the patient under focus in the case study had become disabled due to the accident. It has to be mentioned here that Andrews had been a passionate young man with a job and life ahead of him, where an accident changed his life forever and put him in a wheelchair. There are many restrictions that he struggles with in his daily life; on a more elaborative note, Andrew present is paralyzed from the waist down and needs assistance in mundane everyday works like moving around the house in his wheel chair, bathing, and most important going outside the house on his own is completely impossible for the patient under consideration. Along with that, it has to be mentioned that his parents are also very worried about the wellbeing of their disabled son due to the fact the he could not survive without a full time assistance. The financial constraint on the family is al so rising with the retirement of Andrews father nearing, the patient and his parents are worried if they are going to be able to afford the car needs that a disabled individual needs. Along with that, another very significant objective data about the patients is the complete powerlessness and dependence that the patient feels. On a more elaborative note, he had been unable to voice his needs and grievances to his parents in the fear of offending them and his helplessness. And his helplessness and powerlessness has facilitated feelings of agitation, irritation and anger, which is being reflected oh his actions and his response to his mothers attention to him. The patients is going through extreme mood swings and he is constantly worried about his future. He is worried about becoming too flabby for sitting idle in his wheelchair all day. Even when he meets his older friends, he feels inadequate and inferior to them, his past relationships have ended because of his accident as well and these incidents have increased the psychological burden on the patient. Hence, in this condition the patient is in desperate need for supportive care from the professionals and supportive assistance from the community disability aid and mental health services (O'Donnell et al. 2015). Interpersonal skills needed: It has to be understood that the patient under focus for this case has a variety of different care priorities and a care design for Andrew will have to take into consideration an interdisciplinary practice. First and foremost, it has to be mentioned that the most important concern with a disabled patient is the adequate verbal and nonverbal communication skills. It has to be understood that a disabled individual goes through a myriad of different restrictions and hence the dependence on the care provider often leaves the patient with discomfort, agitation and he tendency to get offended very easily (Beck 2011). In order to provide optimal care to such a patient, it is crucial for the care provider to develop a therapeutic relationship with the patient and build a mutual respect where the patient feels comfortable with the care provider and can feel free to share any grievances with the care provider. The communication approach in this case has to be very compassionate and understandi ng, so that the patient can interpret the genuine concern and insight and then respond to it (Craske 2010). The next interpersonal skills with utmost importance for the care scenario is the nonverbal communication, it has to be understood that the response of the care seeker to the approaches of the care provider is often dependent on the nonverbal gestures of the care provider. For instance the body language and eye contact often play a huge role in gaining the trust of the care seeker. In this case the care provider has to be very friendly and warm in his approach so that Andrew feels engagement and companionship rather than being crowded (Hofmann et al. 2012). The tone of voice and communication style also has a profound effect on the relationship between a care provider and seeker. In this case, the tone of voice and style has to be respectful and empathetic so that the patient feels empowered and is not offended by any manner. Other than that, the insightful behaviour and open communication are two interpersonal skills that will help the care provider gain the confidence of the patien t and help him regain control in his life. Lastly, it has to be understood that the sensitivity and respectful approach to the opinions, believes and perspectives of the patients and his family members (Tolin 2010). Cognitive behavioural approach and its link to the case study: Cognitive behavioural theory is one of the greatest approaches that can help the care providers take up the best approach to improve the health and wellbeing of the patients. The cognitive behavioural approach is primarily utilized to treat any mental health disorders, however the underpinning theories and principles can be very effective in determining and categorizing the care needs of a disability victim and can design better care plan for the same. The main ideology of the cognitive behavioural theory is based on three core areas of human behaviour, cognition, emotion and finally the response or behaviour (Wetherell et al. 2011). On a more elaborative note, cognitive behavioural therapy identifies the negative interpretation and thinking in an individual and thereby the equally negative reactions. For instance, it has to be understood that the general assumption of the cognitive behavioural therapy dictates that any anomaly or abnormality in the behaviour is generated from a flaw ed cognition and interpretation about the world and ownself. These faulty cognitions facilitate distortions in the thinking procedure and the distorted mental representation distorts the behaviour or reaction. There are two particular theories that can be easily correlated with the cognitive behavioural therapy, such as the learning theory and the emotional processing theory. The learning theory states that the behavioural modifications in an individual is dependent on the environmental cues, where as the emotional processing theory provides a framework to understand the onset of behavioural issues and post traumatic stress disorder (Arch et al. 2012). In case of Andrew, it has to be mentioned that the onset of behavioural issues and depression the patient had been due to the faulty perception of the restrictions and troubles he had been encountering in life due to his disability and the confinements that it has introduced in his life. According to the cognitive behavioural approach, the faulty and contorted perception of any activity or incidence is the main contributing factor behind the abnormal behaviours in the individuals and in order to effectively and successfully addresses the behavioural issues and the resultant stress and withdrawal; it is imperative t address the contorted perception (Deblinger et al. 2011). As per the cognitive behavioural therapy, for every negative interpretation of life, there can be a positive alternative interpretation, and the patients have to be encouraged to opt for the positive interpretation instead of the negative one and gradually the behaviour of the patient under therapy will also change positively (Carroll 2011). Possible solution: The possible recommendation to follow for the patient under consideration will need to begin with the patient indentifying the distorted cognitions with the help of a evaluative process. In this case, the patient has distorted conception of his disabilities and the restrictions that these disabilities have posed on him. Along with that, Andrew has a basic idea that due to his dependence and powerlessness, he cannot express his own choices and preferences to his parents. Along with that his perspective guides him to believe that his mothers concern for him is out of pity and his friends disinterest is due to him being crippled. Lastly, it has to be mentioned that Andrew believes he has no future and his life has no meaning anymore that he is dependent on the care providers and he is beginning to feel like a burden (Mitchell et al. 2012). The cognitive therapists will have to help him identify the root to these contorted perceptions and will help him learn to discriminate between his p erception and the reality. The second step of the solution will be encourage the patient to document his change in feelings, if Andrew can document every time the contorted thoughts he can document how he could change it with a positive interpretation and what effect did it impart on his response. This documentation will not only be exceptionally beneficial for him to evaluate his irrational thoughts and how he can convert it to rational thoughts, it will provide a sense of control and power over his own progress. According to the most of the authors, the empowerments and being included in the care planning and implementation procedure enhances the involvement and interest of the patient in their own care plans. And hence, the journals will be a great outlet for Andrew to express his feelings and discover where his thoughts are being distorted and with what kind of positive thoughts he would like to replace them with (Addington et al. 2011). On a more elaborative note, it has to be mentioned that the use of rational emotive behavioural therapy can be excellent for the patient to learn how to convert the irrational believes to rational and optimistic believes. Along with that, the use of ASC model of irrational beliefs provide a step by step framework for the patients and his therapist to follow, by the means of three basic steps, activating event, beliefs, and consequence. The cognitive triad is another set of exponential therapeutic intervention for the patient that suffers through spontaneity of negative thoughts. This triad is based on three basic steps, the negative view of the self, the negative view of the world and resultant negative view of the future (Leichsenring et al. 2013). In this case, due to his paralysis, Andrew had very negative view of himself due to his incompetence and a very negative view of his surroundings as well, be it his parents or the rest due to his dependence and hence as a result of both h e had pessimistic perception of his future. Targeting all thereof these elements can be beneficial for him to overcome the behavioural issues. Ethical considerations: It has to be understood that like any the psychotherapy, the utilization of the cognitive behavioural therapy is no exception to ethical constraints. Ethical practice is a major practice priority among the cognitive behavioural therapists, and in cases where the patients are relatively powerless while receiving the treatment, the ethical constraints are even more imperative. First and foremost, the confidentiality and privacy of the patient has to be maintained and along with that, the importance of informed consent is even more crucial for CBT (Brabban et al. 2017). Along with that, the application of different models of cognitive behavioural therapy often is unconsciously or consciously forceful while changing the cognitions of the patients, which needs to be avoided at all costs. Along with that, even though the fact that cognitive behavioural therapy deals with the concept of transference only marginally, care has to be taken that the transference is not favouring the therapist a nd offending the patient (Sookman 2015). Usefulness of the approach: It has to be mentioned in this context, that the cognitive behavioural therapy is a exceptionally important tool in understanding the behavioural issues of the clients seeking therapy and root cause behind. The therapy is extremely suitable for understanding human behaviour because it focuses on the human thought process and the impact of the thoughts. According to the authors, human behaviour is complex, and the path of the thought process is responsible for both accomplishments and challenges. This therapy hypothesizes on the fact that the behavioural issues are focused on the maladaptive and negative assumptions and perceptions of human mind in any adverse situation and hence their responses or actions are correlated with the degree or nature of the negativity of the assumptions. Hence, the cognitive behavioural therapy provides a useful cause and effect framework to follow and discover the human behavioural issues successfully. Personal reflection: This case study has given me an incredible opportunity to utilize and reflect on my psychological knowledge and expertise in a real world and practical social care providing scenario. This case study required me to read and understand thecognitive behavioural therapy in detail and apply the theoretical principles and assumptions to the case of Andrew. However, I would also like to mention that the process of researching the cognitive behavioural therapy helped me discover key points of human behaviour. I have understood that our perception of any situation is the driving factor behind our actions and in turn our future. Hence we can control the path our future can take if we can control the perception and thoughts about anyone and anything in a particular scenario. This has been a tremendous life lesson for me and I will ensure to implement positive interpretation even in adverse scenarios so that in the social care setting as well, my positive outlook can benefit and inspire my care seekers and can help them find their way back to better living. The case study of Andrew has given me an insight on the practical real life challenges and scenarios that I, as a social care provider can encounter in the future. Along with that, it has to be mentioned that this case study has given me opportunity to understand the behavioural issues Andrew was facing and discover the root cause of the issue with te help of cognitive behavioural therapy. Along with that, I had also the opportunity to recommend care solutions for Andrew and outline the ethical considerations applicable to the case. Hence, I can proudly state that this has been a perfect opportunity to test my skills and expertise and I can state that I am ready for my career in the social care setting. Conclusion: On a concluding note, it can be stated that the stress and the trauma for the accident acquired injuries and resultant disabilities can be huge on the victim and can even lead to many mental health co-morbidities. Hence, in order to avoid such serious consequences, the aid of community social care support can be extremely effective. Although there are many approaches that can help the victims overcome the mental and physical stress that these victims go through, the most important and most frequently used therapy is the cognitive behavioural therapy. This case study utilized the use of different models of cognitive behavioural therapy and the use of this therapy helped in designing a useful and suitable care plan for the patient. Hence, cognitive behavioural therapy is a potent tool in deciphering human behaviour and any anomaly associated with it, with more research emphasis, this therapy can be integrated to many mental and behavioural health issues. References: Addington, J., Epstein, I., Liu, L., French, P., Boydell, K.M. and Zipursky, R.B., 2011. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis.Schizophrenia research,125(1), pp.54-61. Arch, J.J., Eifert, G.H., Davies, C., Vilardaga, J.C.P., Rose, R.D. and Craske, M.G., 2012. Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for mixed anxiety disorders.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,80(5), p.750. Beck, J.S., 2011. Cognitive-behavioral therapy.Clinical textbook of addictive disorders, pp.474-501. Bird, V., Premkumar, P., Kendall, T., Whittington, C., Mitchell, J. and Kuipers, E., 2010. Early intervention services, cognitivebehavioural therapy and family intervention in early psychosis: systematic review.The British Journal of Psychiatry,197(5), pp.350-356. Brabban, A., Byrne, R., Longden, E. and Morrison, A.P., 2017. The importance of human relationships, ethics and recovery-orientated values in the delivery of CBT for people with psychosis.Psychosis,9(2), pp.157-166. Carroll, K.M., 2011. Cognitive behavioral therapy.Lowinson and Ruizs Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, pp.593-602. Craske, M.G., 2010.Cognitivebehavioral therapy. American Psychological Association. Deblinger, E., Mannarino, A.P., Cohen, J.A., Runyon, M.K. and Steer, R.A., 2011. Trauma?focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children: impact of the trauma narrative and treatment length.Depression and anxiety,28(1), pp.67-75. Dryden, W. and Branch, R. eds., 2011.The CBT handbook. Sage. Ehde, D.M., Dillworth, T.M. and Turner, J.A., 2014. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research.American Psychologist,69(2), p.153. Hofmann, S.G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I.J., Sawyer, A.T. and Fang, A., 2012. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses.Cognitive therapy and research,36(5), pp.427-440. Leichsenring, F., Salzer, S., Beutel, M.E., Herpertz, S., Hiller, W., Hoyer, J., Huesing, J., Joraschky, P., Nolting, B., Poehlmann, K. and Ritter, V., 2013. Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.American Journal of Psychiatry,170(7), pp.759-767. Mitchell, M.D., Gehrman, P., Perlis, M. and Umscheid, C.A., 2012. Comparative effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a systematic review.BMC family practice,13(1), p.40. O'Donnell, M.L., Grant, G., Alkemade, N., Spittal, M., Creamer, M., Silove, D., McFarlane, A., Bryant, R.A., Forbes, D. and Studdert, D.M., 2015. Compensation seeking and disability after injury: the role of compensation-related stress and mental health.The Journal of clinical psychiatry,76(8), pp.e1000-5. O'Donnell, M.L., Varker, T., Holmes, A.C., Ellen, S., Wade, D., Creamer, M., Silove, D., McFarlane, A., Bryant, R.A. and Forbes, D., 2013. Disability after injury: the cumulative burden of physical and mental health.The Journal of clinical psychiatry. Olatunji, B.O., Cisler, J.M. and Deacon, B.J., 2010. Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a review of meta-analytic findings.Psychiatric Clinics,33(3), pp.557-577. Rector, N.A. and Beck, A.T., 2012. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Schizophrenia: An Empirical Review Neil A. Rector, PhD and Aaron T. Beck, MD (2001). Reprinted from the J Nerv Ment Dis 189: 278287.The Journal of nervous and mental disease,200(10), pp.832-839. Sookman, D., 2015. Ethical Practice of Cognitive Behavior Therapy. InThe Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics. Tolin, D.F., 2010. Is cognitivebehavioral therapy more effective than other therapies?: A meta-analytic review.Clinical psychology review,30(6), pp.710-720. Wetherell, J.L., Afari, N., Rutledge, T., Sorrell, J.T., Stoddard, J.A., Petkus, A.J., Solomon, B.C., Lehman, D.H., Liu, L., Lang, A.J. and Atkinson, J.H., 2011. A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain.Pain,152(9), pp.2098-2107.